What risks does the idea of ​​a “militancy” with Russia have for Ukraine and NATO?

The first match will be held in Switzerland in a few weeks Peace Summit, that is, a meeting of world leaders to discuss the conditions for ending the Russian war. His preparation is one of the priorities of official Kiev.

But while this process continues, some Western countries – sometimes without even setting this as a goal, and not wanting it – limit aid to Ukraine, pushing for “negotiations” and, in fact, concessions to Russia. Also, the voices of foreign leaders about Russia’s interference in the negotiations have become louder.

Read an article by Serhii Zolotky from the “New Europe” Center about why the current calls for negotiations are dangerous for Ukraine and what Western partners can do to force Russia into real negotiations. Negotiations or surrender? What they are hiding and how “peaceful” perceptions of Ukraine need to change.

After the failed counteroffensive in 2023, Western approaches to military support for Ukraine required radical changes. The approach of limited and quantitative support of Ukraine’s armed forces failed, and the only correct option seemed obvious: it was necessary to turn the “trickle” support into an “avalanche” as Ukraine received more every week. More weapons, which would prove the futility of a protracted war for Russia.


Instead, the opposite happened: instead of a massive arms supply Major Western countries put the process on a long pause. Although there is no real reason to consider such a pause intentional, it does not change the outcome.

Instead of the support promised under the policy “until taken“Ukraine’s weakness happened.

See also  Collapse of government? May decide in September. Rajchl came up with a decisive scenario

In this context, calls for dialogue with China, Turkey, SwitzerlandSlovakia, etc., and that the camp of nations Support the hidden capitulation of UkrainePresenting it in the form of “deactivation” of conflict.

The Kremlin has declared its readiness for negotiations and is doing practically everything possible to derail them.

Putin has created a “Russian reality” that he demands must be accepted, to which the West’s resistance is more modest or transient.

The time for a breakthrough has indeed arrived.

Instead of forcing Ukraine to negotiate, we need ambitious, fast, large-scale support. Finally, it is important to understand that negotiations will take place in the future can only lead to undesirable consequences.

The most important thing to realize is that negotiations do not stop war. Ukrainian information sources have been spreading stories of “secret talks” by Russia that could lead to destabilization in Ukraine.

In addition, there is a risk of an even bigger slowdown in arms supplies to Ukraine, to the point of suspension. Additionally, such “peaceful” negotiations may encourage other aggressors to take action.

Also, the risk of direct war with NATO would increase. Moscow’s claims extend not only to Ukraine, but to the entire Euro-Atlantic space. Russia has been outspoken about the need to redraw NATO’s territory and impose additional conditions on the alliance.

Now the West’s solution should not be how to get a weak Ukraine to the negotiating table, but how to urgently strengthen it.

The decision to set up was long overdue A coalition of assertive statesThose seeking to extend aid to Ukraine.

See also  Who is sweating? An overview of recent changes amid hundreds of missing branches

The “New Europe” Center has developed a version of the vision – a list of 8 initiatives of international partners that can contribute to forcing Russia into real, not simulated, negotiations.

For more details, see Serhiy Sweetkoy’s content Negotiations or surrender? What they are hiding and how “peaceful” perceptions of Ukraine need to change.

Subscribe to “The European Truth”!

If you find an error, highlight the required text and press Ctrl + Enter to report it to the editor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *