Georges St-Pierre on McGregor : “An anomaly” and UFC’s star dilemma

Georges St-Pierre on McGregor : "An anomaly" and UFC's star dilemma

The legendary Georges St-Pierre recently shared his candid thoughts on the UFC’s current star power challenges, particularly highlighting Conor McGregor’s unprecedented impact on the sport. Speaking on the IMPAULSIVE podcast, the former two-division champion offered rare insights into the organization’s struggle to create and maintain marquee fighters in today’s competitive landscape.

McGregor’s unique position in UFC stardom

Georges St-Pierre, one of the most decorated champions in UFC history, didn’t mince words when discussing Conor McGregor’s exceptional status in mixed martial arts. “Conor McGregor, I believe, is an anomaly,” St-Pierre remarked during his podcast appearance. The Canadian icon emphasized that McGregor’s “love me, hate me, but don’t ignore me” approach created an unprecedented level of stardom that’s proven difficult to replicate.

What makes McGregor distinctive isn’t merely his fighting prowess but his ability to transcend the sport. Despite his recent competitive absence since 2021 and mounting legal controversies, the Irishman remains the UFC’s most recognizable figure. His pay-per-view drawing power established new financial benchmarks that transformed fighter expectations about potential earnings.

St-Pierre identified several current stars who’ve shown flashes of mainstream appeal:

  • Sean O’Malley – Charismatic bantamweight with strong social media presence
  • Israel Adesanya – Former middleweight champion known for flashy striking
  • Alex Pereira – Power puncher who captured titles in two weight classes
  • Jon Jones – Widely considered the greatest MMA fighter ever

However, recent losses by O’Malley, Adesanya, and Pereira have complicated the UFC’s marketing efforts. As St-Pierre noted, these setbacks are simply part of the sport’s unpredictable nature, where any fighter can fall on any given night.

The unpredictable nature of MMA and star development

The very element that makes mixed martial arts exciting – its unpredictability – also creates significant challenges for star building. St-Pierre understands this dynamic intimately, having experienced his own shocking upset loss to Matt Serra in 2007 before reclaiming his championship status.

This volatility presents a constant dilemma for UFC executives. The organization’s business model relies heavily on marketable personalities who can drive pay-per-view sales and attract mainstream attention. Yet the competitive nature of the sport means these stars can rapidly lose their luster after defeats.

The current landscape shows this tension clearly. While the UFC enjoys unprecedented financial success with record-breaking gate revenues and a lucrative broadcasting deal on the horizon, fan sentiment increasingly suggests the product lacks compelling personalities at the championship level.

UFC’s Current Business Strengths Star Power Challenges
Record-breaking live gates Recent champion losses
Near-weekly programming McGregor’s competitive inactivity
Upcoming broadcast deal Failure to make marquee matchups
Global expansion Aging veteran roster

St-Pierre acknowledged this reality while maintaining perspective: “Records are made to be broken. But right now, because nobody can do what Conor has done, I don’t think it’s because they don’t have any stars. They have stars.” This balanced view recognizes both the current star power deficit and the potential for new breakout personalities.

Meritocracy versus marketability in championship fights

Perhaps the most compelling portion of St-Pierre’s analysis concerned the fundamental tension between merit-based matchmaking and business considerations. The former champion strongly advocated for maintaining the sport’s competitive integrity despite commercial pressures.

“As a businessman, I think the goal of UFC is to make money,” St-Pierre stated bluntly. “No. 1, it’s not good for them because if one of their superstars lose, it’s not good.” However, he immediately countered this with a championship philosophy: “When you’re champion, you take the No. 1 contender. That’s how it should be.”

This perspective highlights the growing divide between boxing and MMA’s approach to matchmaking. While boxing often creates opportunities for stars to build impressive undefeated records (30-0, 40-0, 60-0) by carefully selecting opponents, St-Pierre believes MMA’s appeal stems from its meritocratic structure.

The UFC’s recent failure to deliver anticipated superfights like Jones vs. Aspinall and Makhachev vs. Topuria has only intensified this debate. St-Pierre didn’t hold back in his assessment: “The champion has nothing to say. You fight who is in front and that’s how it should be. The UFC should take action.”

His passionate defense of meritocracy reflects the ongoing tension between short-term business interests and long-term sport integrity. While protecting marketable champions might seem financially prudent, St-Pierre suggests this approach ultimately undermines what makes MMA compelling to its audience.

As the UFC navigates these challenges in 2025, St-Pierre’s insights from his championship reign offer valuable perspective. The organization may find its next transcendent star by embracing rather than avoiding the sport’s inherent unpredictability while maintaining the competitive framework that distinguishes it from boxing’s more managed approach.

Aoife Gallagher
Scroll to Top